Article List  |  Home  |  Tzemach  |  The Community    
Israel  |  Torah  |  Features  |  New  |  Search  |  E-mail Us

 

Wednesday, October 11, 2000

------------------------------------------------------------------

Myths of the Middle East

by Joseph Farah

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/20001011_xcbtl_myths_brmi.shtml

------------------------------------------------------------------



I've been quiet since Israel erupted in fighting spurred by

disputes over the Temple Mount.



Until now, I haven't even bothered to say, "See, I told you so."

But I can't resist any longer. I feel compelled to remind you

of  the column I wrote just a couple weeks before the latest

uprising. Yeah, folks, I predicted it. That's OK. Hold your

applause.



After all, I wish I had been wrong. More than 80 people have

been killed since the current fighting in and around Jerusalem

began. And for what?



If you believe what you read in most news sources, Palestinians

want a homeland and Muslims want control over sites they

consider holy. Simple, right?



Well, as an Arab-American journalist who has spent some time in

the Middle East dodging more than my share of rocks and mortar

shells, I've got to tell you that these are just phony excuses

for the rioting, trouble-making and land-grabbing.



Isn't it interesting that prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war,

there was no serious movement for a Palestinian homeland?



"Well, Farah," you might say, "that was before the Israelis

seized the West Bank and Old Jerusalem."



That's true. In the Six-Day War, Israel captured Judea, Samaria

and East Jerusalem. But they didn't capture these territories

from Yasser Arafat. They captured them from Jordan's King

Hussein. I can't help but wonder why all these Palestinians

suddenly discovered their national identity after Israel won

the war.



The truth is that Palestine is no more real than Never-Never

Land. The first time the name was used was in 70 A.D. when the

Romans committed genocide against the Jews, smashed the Temple

and declared the land of Israel would be no more. From then on,

the Romans promised, it would be known as Palestine. The name

was derived from the Philistines, a Goliathian people conquered

by the Jews centuries earlier. It was a way for the Romans to

add insult to injury. They also tried to change the name of

Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina, but that had even less staying

power.



Palestine has never existed -- before or since -- as an

autonomous entity. It was ruled alternately by Rome, by Islamic

and Christian crusaders, by the Ottoman Empire and, briefly, by

the British after World War I. The British agreed to restore at

least part of the land to the Jewish people as their homeland.



There is no language known as Palestinian. There is no distinct

Palestinian culture. There has never been a land known as

Palestine governed by Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs,

indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent invention),

Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc. Keep in mind that the Arabs

control 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands. Israel

represents one-tenth of 1 percent of the landmass.



But that's too much for the Arabs. They want it all. And that is

ultimately what the fighting in Israel is about today. Greed.

Pride. Envy. Covetousness. No matter how many land concessions

the Israelis make, it will never be enough.



What about Islam's holy sites? There are none in Jerusalem.



Shocked? You should be. I don't expect you will ever hear this

brutal truth from anyone else in the international media. It's

just not politically correct.



I know what you're going to say: "Farah, the Al Aqsa Mosque and

the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem represent Islam's third most

holy sites."



Not true. In fact, the Koran says nothing about Jerusalem. It

mentions Mecca hundreds of times. It mentions Medina countless

times. It never mentions Jerusalem. With good reason. There is

no historical evidence to suggest Mohammad ever visited

Jerusalem.



So how did Jerusalem become the third holiest site of Islam?

Muslims today cite a vague passage in the Koran, the

seventeenth Sura, entitled "The Night Journey." It relates that

in a dream or a vision Mohammed was carried by night "from the

sacred temple to the temple that is most remote, whose precinct

we have blessed, that we might show him our signs. ..." In the

seventh century, some Muslims identified the two temples

mentioned in this verse as being in Mecca and Jerusalem. And

that's as close as Islam's connection with Jerusalem gets --

myth, fantasy, wishful thinking. Meanwhile, Jews can trace

their roots in Jerusalem back to the days of Abraham.



The latest round of violence in Israel erupted when Likud Party

leader Ariel Sharon tried to visit the Temple Mount, the

foundation of the Temple built by Solomon. It is the holiest

site for Jews. Sharon and his entourage were met with stones

and threats. I know what it's like. I've been there. Can you

imagine what it is like for Jews to be threatened, stoned and

physically kept out of the holiest site in Judaism?



So what's the solution to the Middle East mayhem? Well, frankly,

I don't think there is a man-made solution to the violence.

But, if there is one, it needs to begin with truth. Pretending

will only lead to more chaos. Treating a 5,000-year-old

birthright backed by overwhelming historical and archaeological

evidence equally with illegitimate claims, wishes and wants

gives diplomacy and peacekeeping a bad name.

Article List  |  Home  |  Tzemach  |  The Community    
Israel  |  Torah  |  Features  |  New  |  Search  |  E-mail Us