THE TROJAN HORSE

Will a Palestinian State Bring Peace to the Middle East?

In all recorded modern history of warfare, hatred and evil, including the Nazis in Germany, the Communists in Russia and China, Pol Pot in Indo-China, etc. there did not ever exist the obscene outrage of suicide killers. Even the Japanese Kamikaze pilots only attacked military targets.

The model and inspiration for Osama bin Laden's suicide bombers who hit the World Trade Center in New York, and the Pentagon in Washington, and all the other suicide bombings and shootings since then (e.g., the case in the Indian Parliament, etc., etc.), is Yasser Arafat and the so-called Palestinians.

The concept that it is acceptable and praiseworthy to commit suicide for the sole purpose of murdering noncombatant citizens; the adulation for people who kill themselves in order to slaughter innocent women, children and babies; training and sending young men to destroy themselves just to kill old men and old women; this horror is the sick brainchild of Yasser Arafat and his cohorts.

He is the first. He is the original terrorist to bring this level of terrorism, this plague, to the world. He instituted this new darkness that now threatens all of us. He created the green light for others to follow in these bloody footsteps.

Hence, one has to be either na?ve or psychologically impaired to believe that giving Arafat and the so-called Palestinians a state of their own will turn today's baby killers and their supporters into peaceful neighbors alongside the State of Israel; or that offering them huge economic aid with joint industrial projects will wipe away their deep-seated, bloodthirsty hatred and commitment to the destruction of the State of Israel.

They want it all.

Giving them a state of their own will only enable them to really go after what they believe is theirs, namely: the entire region of Palestine, including the Kingdom of Jordan. Yes, they covet Jordan as well. Not too long ago they tried taking Jordan away from King Hussein. Remember? He repelled them.

The late Faisal Husseini, Arafat's Jerusalem representative, a man who was cultured, sophisticated and considered the most moderate of all the Palestinians, shortly before his death expressed his true feelings in an interview with an Egyptian newspaper. Husseini said: "We must distinguish the strategies and long-term goals from the political-phased goals which we are compelled to accept due to international pressures." But the "ultimate goal is the liberation of all historical Palestine." Explicitly he said: "Oslo had to be viewed as a Trojan horse."

The liberation of all historical Palestine! That includes Jordan, does it not?

The few Arabs who may really want a two-state solution side-by-side with the State of Israel are too few to matter. As soon as a Palestinian state is in place these few will be removed, or killed, and quickly forgotten.

Add Iran to this equation.

As much as the Arab countries dislike Israel, Iran, which is not an Arab country, seems to hate Israel, and openly proclaims its desire, and intent, to destroy her. This is strange. Iran used to be a close ally of Israel till the mullahs took over the country. But what harm has Israel done to the mullahs? I have never heard an explanation for this hatred. Perhaps the mullah's are simply, and cynically, using Israel as an instrument to gain dominance in the region. It is quite clear that Iran, under the mullahs, yearns to become the superpower in the Muslim world. This could be the way. Cozy up to Arafat, support the sworn enemies of Israel (i.e., Hizballah, Hamas, etc. etc.) and send weapons of destruction to Gaza.

Whatever the reason, Iran is now dangerously hovering over Israel, waiting for a foothold in a new Palestinian state. What do you imagine will happen then?

Israel will not go silently into the night.

*******

This paper is a follow up to my earlier paper "The Big Lie."

I have received a number of inquiries basically asking: What about the United Nations' resolution? Didn't the U.N. allocate part of the region for the Arabs? This is an argument many people use to justify the creation of a Palestinian state. Let me address this.

Yes, the first United Nations resolution in that conflict was to partition the region between Jews and Arabs. The Jews accepted that resolution notwithstanding the fact that such acceptance would inevitably create another Arab state called Palestine. The Arabs, on the other hand, not only rejected the resolution, they trampled on it by declaring war on the new State of Israel. Five Arab nations attacked her from all sides in order to destroy her. Well, that did not happen. The Arabs lost the war and have been whining ever since about United Nations resolutions.

Too late, fellas.

It does not work that way - not in international affairs, nor in human relations. If you refuse an offer and attempt to destroy it, you no longer have a right to that offer.

I did not address this issue in my first paper, nor did I cover many other details of the Arab-Israeli conflict. And I did not presume to offer a definitive solution to this painful problem. Who am I to assume such a role for myself? Most likely it will be the United States, the European Union, the Russians, the Arabs, and the Israelis who will determine the final outcome of this conflict.

The reason for my paper was to bring forth certain truths and trust that these truths will effect an honorable solution to the problem.

Sooner or later all the parties involved will attempt a serious solution to this problem. When that happens these truths must be recognized and placed on the negotiating table, or there will never be peace between Arabs and Jews.

Because, unless the Arabs recognize and accept these truths, even if they are given a state of their own, and no matter how many agreements and treaties they sign, they will always feel wronged, cheated, and forced into giving up what they now claim is theirs. They will continue to plot and look for an opportunity to destroy Israel in order to take back what they claim is theirs, especially the younger generation that has been brainwashed to hate the "occupying enemy." Whether there is a Palestinian state or not, there will be no peace.

In fact, a Palestinian state without recognition of these truths will more than likely end up in a full-scale war with Israel, engulfing the entire Middle East.

Peace between the Jews and Arabs can be achieved only in one of two ways. Either one side completely defeats the other side (given existing circumstances, this is not likely to happen), or all the Arabs recognize and accept the truths around this conflict.

One undeniable truth is that there never was a Palestinian state or a Palestinian nation. In fact there are no Palestinians. These are Arabs living in a region that, historically, has been called many things, including Palestine. But there is no Palestinian people.

They have the same ethnicity, the same language, the same religion, the same culture, the same dress, the same cuisine, etc., etc., as all the other Arabs. Yes, there are minor differences, the same minor differences that exist between the Welsh, the Scots, and the Londoners. They are still all Englishmen. The same minor differences that exist between Yankees and Southerners. They are still all Americans, etc., etc. These inconsequential differences do not make a "people."

The small Arab Christian minority, whose religion is different from the religion of all other Arabs, is not the problem. Most of them have stated openly that they would rather be Israeli citizens than live under Arafat and his Palestinian Authority. The problem is the Muslim majority that lives in this region and thinks that living in the region equals sovereignty over the region.

Are the Arabs living in the Sahara region a Saharan people with their own Saharan government? Are the Russians living in Siberia Siberians with their own Siberian government? I explained all this in detail in my paper "The Big Lie."

Again, there are no Palestinians. Hence, the terrorists are not freedom fighters fighting for their Palestinian independence. They are simply Arab terrorists. And the so-called territories are not occupied lands. They are occupied by their owners.

Another truth is Jerusalem. The other day Yasser Arafat again talked about Jerusalem being his capital. Jerusalem was never the capital of any nation other than the nation of Israel. And Arafat wants it to be the capital of a nation that never existed, nor does it exist today.

Why? Because he wants it?

Jerusalem is not just sitting there waiting for an owner. It has an owner. It belongs to someone.

Leaving out history, religion, the Bible, etc., etc., it belongs to Israel simply by right of conquest; no less than the Falkland Islands are English by right of conquest, even though the English people are foreigners to that land. They were never there before they took it. The same with Tahiti. It is French by right of conquest, even though they are foreigners, etc., etc. The same with Texas and California. They are American by right of conquest, even though, etc., etc. Conversely, Israel ruled and owned that land for a thousand years and now has it again by right of conquest.

Arafat wants the world to take Jerusalem and the so-called territories away from Israel and give them to him. Why?

Iraq went to war against Kuwait and occupied its land. This was a peaceful sovereign nation invaded and conquered by an outside enemy. Hence, it was rightfully called "occupied land."

Israel did not go to war against a Palestinian state and occupy its land. Israel was attacked by five Arab nations with intentions to destroy her, and had to defend herself. In that war Israel conquered the territories, not from Arafat and the Palestinians, but from Jordan and Egypt.

A third truth is that most of the Arabs living in Palestine today are not indigenous to that region. It was after the Jews changed deserts and swamps into a productive and thriving land that the Arabs migrated there. Before that time there were only approximately 120,000 Arabs in the entire region, including Jordan.

Arafat himself is not a native of Palestine. He was born and raised in Cairo. Few people know this.

Jews, Babylonians, Syrians, Romans, Muslims, crusaders, Ottomans, and the British; they all ruled this land at one time or another. But never did the Palestinians rule this land. Never.

Now it is again the land of Israel. God's promise, biblical prophecy, 1000 years of historically owning that land (including, during the time of Jesus), or simply "the right of conquest." Whatever the reason, the land is now back in the hands of Israel. It is, therefore, outrageous and deceitful for the Arabs to claim sovereignty over land that was never theirs, and is now owned by someone else.

And it is fascinating, and sad, to watch the nations of the world, and the media, eagerly embrace this deception. It is the same kind of hypocrisy that allows Syria, a known sponsor of terrorists and an occupier of the sovereign nation of Lebanon, a seat on the Security Council of the United Nations.

We need to repeat these truths over and over again in order to dispel the lies that are being repeated over and over again.

Unless there is a massive and long-term re-education of all the Arab people to these truths, with or without a state of their own, the so-called Palestinians will never, willingly, allow the existence of a State of Israel. Only when these truths come to light and are accepted by most of the Arab people can meaningful negotiations begin.

Anyone who is not mesmerized by the repetition of "the big lie" and not victim to political corruption, and seeks justice for everyone, including the so-called Palestinians - they who have been suffering for years due to the lies perpetrated upon them by their political, spiritual, and militant leaders; those who keep them mired in the refugee camps and incite them to die by jihad - anyone whose heart has not turned to stone, cannot help but shout these truths wherever, whenever, and to whomever possible.

I can do no more than bring this to your attention. Perhaps you can do more. I pray you will.